Recap of ResTown Hall Meeting on Baron Cameron

By RCA President Colin Mills

From the beginning, one of RCA’s key missions has been keeping the citizens informed about what’s going on in the community and serving as the voice of the citizens on key issues.  In keeping with that mission, last week we had our first “ResTown Hall Meeting.”  Our goal was to inform and to listen to Restonians on a subject that is essential to Reston’s recreational future: the draft master plan for Baron Cameron Park developed by the Fairfax County Park Authority.

Based on the attendance, it was clear that the community cares about the future of Baron Cameron.  We had strong turnout in spite of cold and rainy weather and the NCAA men’s basketball championship taking place that night.  Not only that, the attendees came from all parts of Reston, not just the neighborhoods closest to the park. 

We opened with a presentation by RCA’s Terry Maynard.  Terry summarized the changes and upgrades proposed in the draft master plan.  He placed the plan in the context of Reston’s planned growth, explaining Baron Cameron’s location relative to the coming Metro stations (not very close) and the Lake Anne redevelopment (quite close).  He also described the other park facilities in and near Reston.

RCA's Terry Maynard explains Baron Cameron Park master plan
as crowd listens.

From there, Terry focused on the plan elements that have generated the most discussion to date: the fields, the proposed recreation center option, the dog park, and the potential impact on traffic.  In each of these areas, he explained the key aspects of the draft plan and the concerns that have been raised.

On the field issue, Terry showed that the plan would actually provide fewer fields than are at the park currently, particularly if part of the land is devoted to a rec center, which is an option in the plan.  The Park Authority plans to increase the capacity of the fields by adding artificial turf and lights.  Terry showed that with fewer fields, total rectangular field capacity at Baron Cameron would only increase by 20% to 40%... and if the rec center is built, it might not increase at all. 

Terry Maynard explains how proposed draft plan would
affect field capacity at Baron Cameron Park.

Terry briefly discussed the rec center option.  As currently envisioned, the Park Authority would supply the land, but would not build the facility (RCC is exploring building a rec center there).  Terry expressed Reston 2020’s position that Town Center North would make more sense for a rec center, as that’s where the residents will be. 

Terry noted that the draft plan roughly doubles the number of parking spaces and adds a new north entrance along Wiehle. He noted the pluses (reduces the problem of park users parking in surrounding neighborhoods, improved access to the park) and minuses (added congestion on Wiehle, access challenges for the neighborhood next door).  He also noted that the new spaces might be tempting for commuters, who might park there and ride the bus to the Wiehle Metro station.

The dog park has become one of the most controversial aspects at Baron Cameron.  Terry did a good job explaining both sides, both the dog owners who treasure it as a recreational and social venue and the neighbors who have complained about the noise it generates.  He laid out possible options: keeping the dog park as is, moving it to the interior of the park (a plan option), or moving it to another location, such as Lake Fairfax Park.

Small group discussion regarding Baron Cameron plan.

After that, we broke into small groups for discussion.  My table contained a nice cross-section of the community.  Some of our folks lived across the street from the park; others lived on the other side of town.  Some had been Restonians for decades; others were relative newcomers.  Some had followed the process closely; others came primarily to learn.

Given the diversity of perspectives around the table, it’s no surprise that we had a lively discussion.  We had some good questions and some creative ideas.  When the other tables reported back to the larger group, it was clear that they’d also had great discussions.  There was no invective, no shouting; just thoughtful citizens sharing their views and raising honest questions.  It was exactly the kind of forum we hoped to create.

After the tables had shared their feedback, we gave every audience member a few sticky dots to identify the points that mattered most to them. 

Audience members using dots to show their priorities.

When we totaled up the dots, it was clear what the community likes and doesn’t like about the plan.  The respondents liked the increased field capacity, the addition of trails and fitness stations, the retention of the existing gardens, and the planned multi-use courts.  They didn’t like the amount of added parking, the potential added traffic on Wiehle, and the insufficient space dedicated to group social activities.  They expressed strong opposition to a rec center at Baron Cameron.  And they mentioned some things to add, like bike storage, a circumferential trail, and a Memorial Garden.

If one concern predominated, it was that the plan tries to do too much in too little space.  Unfortunately, we’re likely to hear this concern more often as Reston grows.  We’re an active community; kids and adults alike are involved in running, biking, sports leagues, and other recreational activities.  The demand for recreational amenities is going to rise – sharply – as Reston’s population increases. 

But the available space for those amenities is likely to shrink.  Meeting increased demand for recreation in a limited space, and with limited financial resources, will be a major challenge for our leaders to meet in the coming years.  We’ll need to be smart in identifying our priorities, and creative in finding and implementing solutions.

What’s next?  We’re compiling the feedback from the meeting into a community response, which we will submit to the Park Authority.  We will highlight the most important issues that the community identified, along with recommendations based on them.  But we will also include all the feedback we received, to ensure that everyone’s voice is represented in our report.

I believe our inaugural ResTown Hall Meeting was a success.  I look forward to this being the first of many such meetings.  I hope to see you at the next one.  And whether you attended this one or not, I hope you’ll share your comments with the Park Authority at Parkmail@fairfaxcounty.gov (deadline for public comments is April 27^th).  In order to make the best decisions for our community, the Park Authority needs to hear from our citizens.